Subject	Im would think so (n/m)
Posted by	LedZep(196.8 RWHP) on March 24, 2002 at 1:33 AM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	Is 225 RWHP realistic on a NA w/out NO or major engine work> posted by minorleaguer (Illuminated) on March 24, 2002 at 12:25 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Is 225 RWHP realistic on a NA w/out NO or major engine work> - minorleaguer (Illuminated) 00:25:41 03/24/02 370cc's and Blue bottle easy :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:37:56 03/24/02 I don't think so - Marshall 00:52:31 03/24/02 Flywheel free's HP not gives :) - ZBlacktt 01:15:57 03/24/02 I mean it won't register much difference on a dyno - Marshall 01:54:54 03/24/02 Yes, good answer :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 03:44:46 03/24/02 Im would think so (n/m) - LedZep(196.8 RWHP) 01:33:00 03/24/02 Let's just say it's never been done in the states... - SeedyRom (Z=Voodoo) 01:36:02 03/24/02 actually AllNatural got 235RWHP on his NA (n/m) - CaptanZap(OK 2 B NA) 11:25:27 03/24/02 Without NOS? I doubt that. - SeedyRom (Z=Voodoo) 02:06:47 03/25/02 after Joe Ramos(qwktwin) is done with my car we will see =) (n/m) - E$P(SF Bay Area) 01:48:50 03/24/02 What are you doing to your car now? :) (n/m) - Amir (SF Bay Area) 19:10:06 03/24/02 heheh secret secret stuff amir...congrats on the tt... - E$P(SF Bay Area) 03:39:54 03/25/02 No. You'll be lucky to see 200rwhp w/o N2O. (n/m) - timz 09:42:08 03/24/02 bullshit...look at my hp and all ive done is POP and pulley (n/m) - LedZep(196.8 RWHP) 11:39:41 03/24/02 Holy shit!!! with only pop and pulley you get 196.8rwhp?! - timz 12:38:25 03/24/02 Missin my point dog, your way off on your NA figures (n/m) - LedZep(196.8 RWHP) 13:42:09 03/24/02 Yes, easily (n/m) - F8IZHIS 10:40:33 03/24/02 Back when mine was N/A I had 276RWHP with... - BooZTT (Hawaii) 16:45:12 03/24/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.